HTL-Turnier
27.11.2009 - Endergebnis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cuppunkte |
|
Punkte |
|
Ränge |
|
Siegpunkte
(SP) |
|
R% |
|
Nr. |
Spnr. |
Name |
Ort |
Pkte |
SP |
|
OÖ |
TTC |
|
R1 |
R2 |
R3 |
R4 |
R5 |
|
R1 |
R2 |
R3 |
R4 |
R5 |
|
R1 |
R2 |
R3 |
R4 |
R5 |
|
R% |
|
1 |
4050 |
Eckerl Kurt |
Innsbruck |
33 |
52 |
|
223 |
222 |
|
11 |
3 |
11 |
-14 |
22 |
|
1. |
2. |
1. |
2. |
1. |
|
12 |
8 |
12 |
8 |
12 |
|
86,7% |
|
2 |
4038 |
Zathamer Ludwig |
Hopfgarten i. D. |
117 |
50 |
|
198 |
204 |
|
5 |
15 |
54 |
24 |
19 |
|
2. |
1. |
1. |
1. |
2. |
|
8 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
8 |
|
86,7% |
|
3 |
4005 |
Hohlbrugger Reinhard |
Innsbruck |
76 |
46 |
|
180 |
186 |
|
10 |
72 |
33 |
-46 |
7 |
|
1. |
1. |
1. |
4. |
1. |
|
12 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
10 |
|
80,0% |
|
4 |
3244 |
Mair Markus |
Innsbruck |
104 |
44 |
|
168 |
170 |
|
36 |
2 |
-50 |
72 |
44 |
|
1. |
2. |
4. |
1. |
1. |
|
12 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
|
73,3% |
|
5 |
4047 |
Veider Stefan |
Hopfgarten i. D. |
82 |
42 |
|
156 |
154 |
|
36 |
33 |
22 |
-1 |
-8 |
|
1. |
1. |
2. |
2. |
3. |
|
12 |
12 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
|
73,3% |
|
6 |
3416 |
Waidacher Herbert |
Innsbruck |
76 |
40 |
|
147 |
140 |
|
7 |
31 |
14 |
-22 |
46 |
|
2. |
1. |
2. |
4. |
1. |
|
8 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
|
66,7% |
|
7 |
4082 |
Clementi Johannes |
Innsbruck |
22 |
36 |
|
138 |
126 |
|
-2 |
10 |
-16 |
3 |
27 |
|
3. |
2. |
3. |
2. |
1. |
|
4 |
8 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
|
60,0% |
|
8 |
4003 |
Neumeister Birgit |
Völs |
9 |
36 |
|
131 |
114 |
|
19 |
-5 |
25 |
-34 |
4 |
|
1. |
3. |
1. |
4. |
2. |
|
12 |
4 |
12 |
0 |
8 |
|
60,0% |
|
9 |
4022 |
Rath Thomas |
Innsbruck |
91 |
34 |
|
124 |
102 |
|
-36 |
15 |
72 |
87 |
-47 |
|
4. |
1. |
1. |
1. |
4. |
|
0 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
|
60,0% |
|
10 |
4020 |
Scheicher Wolfgang |
Innsbruck |
59 |
34 |
|
117 |
91 |
|
-47 |
0 |
11 |
88 |
7 |
|
4. |
3. |
2. |
1. |
1. |
|
0 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
10 |
|
60,0% |
|
11 |
4014 |
Hueber Harald |
Axams |
31 |
34 |
|
110 |
81 |
|
11 |
-1 |
15 |
6 |
0 |
|
2. |
2. |
2. |
2. |
3. |
|
6 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
|
60,0% |
|
12 |
4060 |
Weiler Philipp |
Absam |
12 |
34 |
|
105 |
72 |
|
11 |
-31 |
7 |
19 |
6 |
|
2. |
4. |
2. |
1. |
2. |
|
6 |
0 |
8 |
12 |
8 |
|
60,0% |
|
13 |
4065 |
Zathamer Elisabeth |
Hopfgarten i. D. |
84 |
32 |
|
100 |
63 |
|
3 |
60 |
-28 |
61 |
-12 |
|
3. |
1. |
4. |
1. |
3. |
|
4 |
12 |
0 |
12 |
4 |
|
53,3% |
|
14 |
4041 |
Ploner Wolfgang |
Hopfgarten i. D. |
39 |
32 |
|
95 |
55 |
|
8 |
2 |
18 |
-17 |
28 |
|
2. |
3. |
2. |
4. |
1. |
|
8 |
4 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
|
53,3% |
|
15 |
3328 |
Neurauter Carmen |
Innsbruck |
35 |
32 |
|
90 |
48 |
|
3 |
17 |
28 |
11 |
-24 |
|
3. |
2. |
1. |
2. |
4. |
|
4 |
8 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
|
53,3% |
|
16 |
4010 |
Luger Thomas |
Innsbruck |
18 |
32 |
|
85 |
41 |
|
10 |
-58 |
3 |
-1 |
64 |
|
2. |
4. |
2. |
2. |
1. |
|
8 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
|
60,0% |
|
17 |
4015 |
Günther
Maria-Schahrzad |
Innsbruck |
18 |
32 |
|
80 |
36 |
|
31 |
5 |
15 |
-41 |
8 |
|
1. |
2. |
2. |
4. |
3. |
|
12 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
|
53,3% |
|
18 |
4017 |
Hueber Brigitta |
Axams |
10 |
32 |
|
76 |
30 |
|
-31 |
-13 |
30 |
21 |
3 |
|
3. |
4. |
1. |
1. |
3. |
|
4 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
4 |
|
53,3% |
|
19 |
4032 |
Siehs Gottfried |
Innsbruck |
-5 |
32 |
|
72 |
25 |
|
24 |
-4 |
-14 |
-31 |
20 |
|
1. |
3. |
3. |
4. |
1. |
|
12 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
|
53,3% |
|
20 |
4002 |
Waldauf Daniel |
Matrei i. O. |
11 |
28 |
|
68 |
21 |
|
4 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
-17 |
|
2. |
1. |
3. |
3. |
4. |
|
8 |
12 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
|
46,7% |
|
21 |
2889 |
Zöschg Erich |
Innsbruck |
-20 |
28 |
|
64 |
17 |
|
-1 |
-31 |
23 |
-19 |
8 |
|
3. |
4. |
1. |
3. |
2. |
|
4 |
0 |
12 |
4 |
8 |
|
46,7% |
|
22 |
4087 |
Spiegl Franz |
Seefeld |
-33 |
28 |
|
60 |
14 |
|
-10 |
-5 |
-41 |
19 |
4 |
|
3. |
3. |
4. |
1. |
2. |
|
4 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
8 |
|
46,7% |
|
23 |
4026 |
Mairhofer Norbert |
Innsbruck |
-43 |
26 |
|
56 |
11 |
|
23 |
-11 |
-22 |
-31 |
-2 |
|
2. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
2. |
|
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
8 |
|
46,7% |
|
24 |
4011 |
Lampacher Daniel |
Innsbruck |
-26 |
24 |
|
52 |
9 |
|
-19 |
53 |
-45 |
-83 |
68 |
|
4. |
1. |
4. |
4. |
1. |
|
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
40,0% |
|
25 |
4089 |
Steidl Josef |
Hall i. T. |
-33 |
24 |
|
49 |
7 |
|
-40 |
13 |
-31 |
69 |
-44 |
|
4. |
1. |
4. |
1. |
4. |
|
0 |
12 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
|
40,0% |
|
26 |
4008 |
Mathies Christian |
Innsbruck |
-35 |
24 |
|
46 |
5 |
|
-29 |
51 |
-47 |
-24 |
14 |
|
4. |
1. |
4. |
3. |
2. |
|
0 |
12 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
|
40,0% |
|
27 |
4071 |
Sebastiani Hans |
Innsbruck |
-39 |
24 |
|
43 |
4 |
|
19 |
-48 |
-17 |
15 |
-8 |
|
1. |
4. |
4. |
2. |
3. |
|
12 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
|
40,0% |
|
28 |
2887 |
Hoffmann Bernhard |
Rum |
-76 |
24 |
|
40 |
3 |
|
35 |
-9 |
47 |
-63 |
-86 |
|
2. |
3. |
1. |
4. |
4. |
|
8 |
4 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
|
40,0% |
|
29 |
4086 |
Rath-Kathrein Irmgard |
Innsbruck |
-40 |
20 |
|
37 |
2 |
|
-20 |
-21 |
-2 |
17 |
-14 |
|
4. |
4. |
2. |
2. |
3. |
|
0 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
|
33,3% |
|
30 |
4081 |
Uiberreiter Manfred |
Innsbruck |
-65 |
20 |
|
34 |
1 |
|
-13 |
-28 |
-13 |
-7 |
-4 |
|
3. |
4. |
3. |
3. |
2. |
|
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
|
33,3% |
|
31 |
4004 |
Welte Heike |
Innsbruck |
-69 |
20 |
|
31 |
1 |
|
25 |
-45 |
-9 |
-26 |
-14 |
|
1. |
4. |
3. |
3. |
4. |
|
12 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
|
33,3% |
|
32 |
4016 |
Kirchner Gerhard |
Schwaz |
-104 |
20 |
|
28 |
1 |
|
11 |
-42 |
-56 |
1 |
-18 |
|
2. |
4. |
4. |
2. |
3. |
|
8 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
|
33,3% |
|
33 |
4085 |
Märk Elmar |
Birgitz |
-126 |
18 |
|
26 |
1 |
|
-17 |
-11 |
-24 |
-16 |
-58 |
|
4. |
2. |
3. |
2. |
4. |
|
0 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
0 |
|
33,3% |
|
34 |
3424 |
Martini Holger |
Innsbruck |
-61 |
16 |
|
24 |
1 |
|
-53 |
-5 |
3 |
-7 |
1 |
|
4. |
3. |
3. |
3. |
3. |
|
0 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
26,7% |
|
35 |
4006 |
Kitzelmann Elke |
Innsbruck |
-64 |
16 |
|
22 |
1 |
|
-8 |
-6 |
-26 |
-8 |
-16 |
|
3. |
2. |
4. |
3. |
4. |
|
4 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
|
26,7% |
|
36 |
4021 |
Hochleitner Fritz |
Innsbruck |
-88 |
14 |
|
20 |
1 |
|
-16 |
-24 |
3 |
-23 |
-28 |
|
4. |
3. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
|
0 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
|
26,7% |
|
|
Legende: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nr. |
|
Rang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SP |
|
Siegpunkte (Gesamt) |
|
Pkt |
|
Punkte aus der Schrift |
|
R1 |
|
Runde |
|
OÖ |
|
Oberöst. Cuppunkte (fürs Österreich-Finale in Linz) |
|
TTC |
|
Cuppunkte für den Tiroler Tarockcup |
|
|
Bei
Siegpunktegleichheit entscheiden die folgenden Kriterien (der Reihe nach): |
|
die Summe der
erspielten Punkte (Schrift), die besseren Platzierungen (Tischränge), das
beste |
|
Rundenergebnis
(Schrift), die bessere Finalrunde (Schrift) und zuletzt das Los. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|